Doublets circa 1470

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Zachos
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:34 pm

Doublets circa 1470

Postby Zachos » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:21 pm

Doublets circa 1470

So most of the things I've heard about doublets is that they have extra panels for the "skirts" in order for the fitted-ness to work properly. I guess I have a weird body, because I can get the desired effect without adding the skirt.

Whats the thoughts? My new doublet will be completely hand sewn, so knocking down the amount of seams would be good, but I'll only do it if its historically correct.

Cheers

Zac


Slowly realizing just how far is still to go.

guthrie
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Polmont-Edinburgh

Postby guthrie » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:34 pm

You mean your waist is the same size as your hips and chest?
Interesting.



User avatar
gregory23b
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2923
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Gyppeswyk, Suffolk

Postby gregory23b » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:42 pm

He needs to add more bulk to the top to give him some more chest then.


muahha


middle english dictionary

Isabela on G23b "...somehow more approachable in real life"

http://medievalcolours.blogspot.com

"I know my place." Alice the Huswyf

User avatar
Zachos
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:34 pm

Postby Zachos » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:24 pm

guthrie wrote:You mean your waist is the same size as your hips and chest?
Interesting.


No, it means I have a flat stomach.


Slowly realizing just how far is still to go.

guthrie
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Polmont-Edinburgh

Postby guthrie » Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:07 pm

but then how can you claim to have a doublet without any need for skirts? We are talking about a tight fitting doublet which comes down to perhpas half way dopwn your hips, or around 4 inches below your true waist, are we not?
Certainly, some earlier doublets seem to have all been one piece, but if you are doing 1470, then you need the skirts to expand out again after your narrow waist.

What desired effect do you think you are looking for?



User avatar
lidimy
Post Knight
Posts: 1799
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Flitting between the centuries.
Contact:

Postby lidimy » Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:39 pm

Zachos wrote:
guthrie wrote:You mean your waist is the same size as your hips and chest?
Interesting.


No, it means I have a flat stomach.


Oooh that's cutting! :lol: But as Gurthrie said, you need to accentuate that fact, not cover it up.

Surely a doublet without the extra skirts is only a viable possibility if you can find more than one reference to it?

Anyway... why are you going on about the amount of sewing... you're not that one making it are you? :twisted:


'As long as you have a coif on, you're decent.' Image

guthrie
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Polmont-Edinburgh

Postby guthrie » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:43 pm

Mention of flat stomachs is nothing- I was over 6 foot tall at 18 and still only weighed 9.5 stones. I only got up to 11.5 stones by the time I was 25, and even then it doesn't really show.



User avatar
Zachos
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:34 pm

Postby Zachos » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:29 pm

lidimy wrote:Anyway... why are you going on about the amount of sewing... you're not that one making it are you? :twisted:


No, but I don't want mother to wear her fingers to the bone.

Essentially, I'm asking if 1470ish doublets ALWAYS had the waist seam. I know evidence will always be sketchy on that kind of thing, but it really is a lot more work.

It sounds like Guthrie and myself have the same issues when strong winds blow. I've set myself the target of being two stone heavier by the end of this year. Otherwise I'll get lifted out of my saddle whenever I hit anything with my lance...

Cheers

Zac


Slowly realizing just how far is still to go.

guthrie
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Polmont-Edinburgh

Postby guthrie » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:10 pm

I don't know how old you are, but the best thing to do is keep training, eat healthily and sensibly, and if you still havn't filled out by the time you're 26 or 27, then it'll never happen. If it hadn't been for the re-enactment training with bills and swords putting a bit of muscle on me, I wouldn't even have reached 11.5 stones.



User avatar
Dave B
Post Knight
Posts: 1737
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Postby Dave B » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:16 pm

guthrie wrote:I don't know how old you are, but the best thing to do is keep training, eat healthily and sensibly, and if you still havn't filled out by the time you're 26 or 27, then it'll never happen. If it hadn't been for the re-enactment training with bills and swords putting a bit of muscle on me, I wouldn't even have reached 11.5 stones.


Pah. I was still dead skinny at 30.

Then I got married and had two kids, and now i'm quite fat. It's never too late to get fat.


Find time in every day to look at your life and say; 'Well, it could be worse'

Kurt's uncle Bob.

User avatar
Skevmeister
Post Centurion
Posts: 903
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 12:10 pm
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Postby Skevmeister » Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:40 am

I'm here with Dave on that one, kids, hard work and beer all add to that wonderful Mail padding we call lardiness !!!


ad augusta per angusta

No Hamster's, Moderators, Animals, or Re-Enactors were harmed in the making of this post.

Skev keeping it real since '86

Apathy Ain't A Policy

guthrie
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Polmont-Edinburgh

Postby guthrie » Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:24 am

Dave B wrote:Pah. I was still dead skinny at 30.

Then I got married and had two kids, and now i'm quite fat. It's never too late to get fat.

I am differentiating between having some muscle, being stick thin (Some teenagers I've seen look like I could break them in half, and i'm not even strong) and being fat. Oddly enough everyone my age or so I know who is married or going out with someone has a paunch, except for one of them who was in training for half marathons, and another who is like myself.



User avatar
Vicky
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:21 pm

Postby Vicky » Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:26 pm

You do not need a waist seam on 1470s doublets, it can be fitted without. See:
http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/m ... john1.html



User avatar
lidimy
Post Knight
Posts: 1799
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Flitting between the centuries.
Contact:

Postby lidimy » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:46 pm

But if Zac is going for the conventional doublet with the triangular standing collar, that doesn't really apply, does it...?


'As long as you have a coif on, you're decent.' Image

guthrie
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: Polmont-Edinburgh

Postby guthrie » Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:16 pm

Well, that picture looks like you can have a doublet with no skirsts, as long as you cut the cloth properly. But well spotted, it has no collar.



User avatar
Zachos
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:34 pm

Postby Zachos » Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:28 am

Surely the construction of doublets wouldn't change with the different collars? If its possible to get the correct shape using no separate skirts, then thats what they'd do. No everyone was working from the same tailors book.


Slowly realizing just how far is still to go.

User avatar
Andy R
Post Centurion
Posts: 826
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:45 am
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Contact:

Postby Andy R » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:02 pm

Dave B wrote:Pah. I was still dead skinny at 30.

Then I got married and had two kids, and now i'm quite fat. It's never too late to get fat.


What that man said :cry:

(added two stone in two years)


Young men have often been ruined through owning horses, or through backing them, but never through riding them: unless of course they break their necks, which, taken at a gallop, is a very good death to die

http://www.16ld.org

User avatar
lidimy
Post Knight
Posts: 1799
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Flitting between the centuries.
Contact:

Postby lidimy » Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:12 pm

Zachos wrote:Surely the construction of doublets wouldn't change with the different collars? If its possible to get the correct shape using no separate skirts, then thats what they'd do. No everyone was working from the same tailors book.


No, but if you were directly approached to provide the source(s) for that particular style, then you'd be forced into a compromised position surely, by saying 'well I took that bit from there, that bit from there...' etc. Not saying that it is impossible that they mixed and matched, just that it is perhaps best approached with caution by reenactors.


'As long as you have a coif on, you're decent.' Image

User avatar
Lonestan
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Widnes ... ish
Contact:

Postby Lonestan » Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:08 pm

What Dave, Skev and Andy said!
I had a conversation with Dave last year about moob development in men with children, now I've had a second son they've really come on!


Universal greeting: Bah Weep Graaagnah Wheep Ni Ni Bong!

User avatar
Colin Middleton
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2037
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Postby Colin Middleton » Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:00 pm

That could be a wait seam, but it doesn't appear to be. I would have thought one necessary for a waist like that.

Sarah Thursfield modled a toil on me as a demonstration and I NEARLY came away without a seam at the front (my belly sticks out about as much as my chest), but I needed one at the back because my bum sticks out.

I don't beleive that they would add a seam if they didn't need it, but I suspect that most people do by virtue of the shape of the human body.

Good luck on getting a nice fit out of it Zachos.


Colin

"May 'Blood, blood, blood' be your motto!"

Image

User avatar
Zachos
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:34 pm

Postby Zachos » Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:49 pm

lidimy wrote:No, but if you were directly approached to provide the source(s) for that particular style, then you'd be forced into a compromised position surely, by saying 'well I took that bit from there, that bit from there...' etc. Not saying that it is impossible that they mixed and matched, just that it is perhaps best approached with caution by reenactors.


If every other source showed waist seams I guess you would be right, but the problem is that most don't show anything there, or seams at all, so very little can be gathered. I think we'll try it without, while still going for the classic 15th century look.

Thanks all, now you can talk about the changes age makes to your body.

Zac


Slowly realizing just how far is still to go.

User avatar
lidimy
Post Knight
Posts: 1799
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Flitting between the centuries.
Contact:

Postby lidimy » Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:59 am

OK, I was making assumptions based on just that pic (wil lI be shot at dawn?) as I haven't exactly spent time on doubletical research!




But waist seams still look better! :oops:


'As long as you have a coif on, you're decent.' Image

User avatar
Shaggy
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 5:49 pm

Postby Shaggy » Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:51 pm

Andy R wrote:
Dave B wrote:Pah. I was still dead skinny at 30.

Then I got married and had two kids, and now i'm quite fat. It's never too late to get fat.


What that man said :cry:

(added two stone in two years)


5 stone in 5 years, dead simple really - left the Army, quit running and doing PT but kept on eating 5 meals a day and drinking like a fish......

.......Regretting it now though!


Image


Return to “1100-1500”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests