Guthrie wrote:
Ahh, but what is the actual heating process? I have roughly 1800 year old translations of what are effectively workshop aide-memoires, and they talk about turning certain crystals into "emeralds", the more to fool people or make nice jewellery, so the question is, what is the heating cycle?
Crystals from different localities have different properties when heated. The modern "green amethyst" is
irradiated first, so unless you have access to a nuclear reactor

, you probably will struggle with this one.
I'd deffinitively like to look at your translation, it might have points which I could interpret based on my knowledge of modern gem treatments.
I have synthetic green Quartz (grown gydrothermally) but it does not look like emerald. I also have a high pressure impregnated quartz which is bright green, but that also is a poor substitute. I have an interest in synthetics and treatments, these are reference pieces, not for sale.
The classical method of turning quartz to emerald was to crush it and make it into green glass. In the 80's and 90's many people from Zimbabwe-Rhodesia (as it was then) were conned by people melting 7-up bottles and pouring the melt into a sand mould made by sticking a hexagonal re-enforcing rod into the ground. The sand stuck giving a "natural" appearance.
One guy said "but I saw them pull it out of the ground in the mine"
To which the reply was "You obviously didn't see them put it in the ground five minutes earlier!"
It is often said by gemmologists that the closer you get to the mining areas, the more synthetics / treatments / outright fakes you see. In parts of Thailand there are no intact traffic lights because the glass is smashed, pinched and sold to tourists as precious stones! Buyer beware!!!!
Greenland&game wrote:
So what has Guthrie made? Prasiolite or Green Amethyst?
Citrine, as you stated earlier.
Greenland&game wrote:
Have you any knowledge of Chrysoprase being purple with gold flecks?
See earlier post by Brother Ranulf.
Lapidairists are environmentally friendly and often re-cycle names, as shown in my previous post. It is referring to a different stone. I have theories, but am not yet ready to go into print.
