Moderator: Moderators
PaulMurphy wrote:Unlikely but not entirely impossible, but the evidence is both scant and distant. The games which were definitely known to be around at that time (nine mens morris, tafl, and fox and geese, to name a few) have very much more evidence for their existence, and so it is unlikely that any of the UK-based societies would accept it in a LH context.
After all, there have been dirhams found in York and in most Viking settlements in western Europe, but that doesn't mean that the Vikings spoke Arabic.
Paul.
An ivory chess piece, excavated at a Byzantine palace
Professor Richard Hodges said: "We are wondering if it is the king or queen because it has a little cross but we are not sure." The team is now trying to find out exactly which piece it has found.
Malvoisin wrote:
I'm not doubting Professor Richard Hodges expertise, but IMO before you re-write the history books be 100% sure!
WorkMonkey wrote:Malvoisin wrote:
I'm not doubting Professor Richard Hodges expertise, but IMO before you re-write the history books be 100% sure!
Surely you can never be 100% sure of anything unless there is an attached note saying "this is definately a chess board, and yes, we were definately playing it the same way you do in the future"
Even if you found a chess board, with all the right pieces, there might have been a completely different set of rules which didn't make it anything like chess. All you can do is make educated guesses, and this man is educated (probably) and making a guess.
Tuppence wrote:no matter how educated you are, you can't know for sure what something is, you can only give your opinion - and one man's is as valid as another's.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests